The Tarasoff decision revealed a difference in thinking between courts and mental health specialists subject to the rule. Courts are concerned
A) first about the political consequences of their decisions
B) about weighing and balancing values such as actions that attempt to save a life are more important than professional confidentiality
C) with the empirical consequences of the rules of law they develop
D) with the precision of the technology available to implement the decision
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: The Vera Institute Bail project demonstrated that
A)
Q37: Bounty hunters
A) have to observe individual rights
Q38: Because bail bondspersons who provide bail bonds
Q39: The Tarasoff case was a malpractice suit,
Q40: The Tarasoff duty as the California Supreme
Q42: Mental health professionals were concerned that the
Q43: A majority of mental health professionals
A) agreed
Q44: Under Tarasoff, mental health professionals have a
Q45: Under Tarasoff, mental health professionals have a
Q46: Giving a potential victim a warning
A) was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents