A fundamental question that arises when considering eyewitness testimony is whether or not jurors exposed to expert testimony are better able to distinguish inaccurate testimony from accurate testimony. Using mock jurors, some studies have shown that
A) On average, jurors found the defendant guilty as often when hearing expert testimony and when they did not
B) Jurors found the defendant guilty more often when they heard expert testimony
C) Jurors found the defendant guilty less often when hearing expert testimony
D) Jurors never found the defendant guilty

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Studies have shown that the presence of expert testimony does not significantly change the rate at which jurors find defendants guilty, indicating that jurors are equally likely to find a defendant guilty whether they hear expert testimony or not.

A Fundamental Question That Arises When Considering Eyewitness Testimony Is