Research evaluating the effectiveness of the CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates program in Family Court shows
A) that court appointed attorneys who are members of the bar are less effective than citizen volunteers in obtaining services for the children they were assigned
B) that CASA volunteers are ineffective because they are assigned too many cases at the same time
C) that court appointed attorneys who get relatively low fees are far more cost-effective than CASA volunteers in representing children's interests in family court
D) that judges are reluctant to accept the recommendations of CASA volunteers because they are not professionally trained
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: Reports of suspected child abuse and neglect
Q39: The majority of reports of suspected child
Q40: The standard of proof for substantiating a
Q41: If a case is substantiated during the
Q42: A child protection case may be referred
Q44: Parental rights are terminated
A) in most cases
Q45: Child protective service workers
A) make easily difficult
Q46: The mandated reporter statute typically requires a
Q47: Mandated reporters
A) sometimes fail to make reports
Q48: Behaviors that may be interpreted as sexual
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents