In the Griggs and early employment discrimination cases, the US. Supreme Court held that
A) employment tests were discriminatory under the law and could not be used for selection purposes
B) employment tests which had a disparate impact could be used if it could be shown that the test was valid, i.e. predicted job performance
C) employment tests which had disparate impact could be used if the employer simply asserted it was using the tests as a matter of business necessity
D) it was irrational to use tests with a disparate impact for employment selection purposes because the tests had high construct validity
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: In Great Britain, because of the greater
Q46: "High stakes" testing mandated by some state
Q47: The social service version of the Heisenberg
Q48: The percent of students in a school
Q49: High stakes testing most likely
A) results in
Q51: In the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in
Q52: State professional licensing tests have disparate impact
Q53: Defenders of the use of psychological tests
Q54: Defenders of tests argue that
A) using tests
Q55: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents