If the courts apply the rule of reason criterion to a firm that dominates a market but does not engage in anticompetitive behavior, it would not find the firm to be in violation of the antitrust laws.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The rule of reason criterion assesses whether a firm's conduct has an unreasonable restraint on competition, focusing on the actual impact of the behavior rather than the firm's market dominance alone. If a dominant firm does not engage in anticompetitive behavior, it would not be found in violation of antitrust laws under this criterion.

If the Courts Apply the Rule of Reason Criterion to a Firm