In this case, the court held that an error made by the trial court in admitting illegally obtained evidence does not require an automatic reversal of the conviction if the error is determined to be harmless.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Arizona v. Fulminate is the case where the Supreme Court held that an error made by the trial court in admitting illegally obtained evidence does not require an automatic reversal of the conviction if the error is determined to be harmless. This principle is part of the harmless error doctrine, which allows appellate courts to affirm convictions despite errors in the trial process if those errors are deemed not to have affected the trial's outcome.

In This Case, the Court Held That an Error Made