Most proponents of strict constructionism argue that if the text of the Constitution is ambiguous, then a judge should

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Proponents of strict constructionism believe that the original intent of the Constitution should guide judicial interpretation. Therefore, if the text is ambiguous, judges should rely on the understanding of the words at the time they were written to determine their meaning. Choice A is incorrect because strict constructionists would not rely on their personal judgment or on notions of fairness and justice to interpret the Constitution. Choice B is incorrect because strict constructionists would not take into account evolving attitudes or circumstances, as they believe in following the original intent of the Constitution. Choice C is incorrect because insufficient information is not a sufficient basis for a ruling.

Most Proponents of Strict Constructionism Argue That If the Text