In the case of Wong Sun v. United States, the Supreme Court held that:
A) the exclusionary rule was not applicable when the government learns of the evidence from a source independent of any taint.
B) not all evidence is automatically barred simply because it may have been gathered in violation of the Constitution.
C) illegally obtained evidence may be admitted if it could have been obtained by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint of illegality.
D) All of the above statements are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The drafters of the Bill of Rights
Q3: The Fourth Amendment deals with:
A) searches.
B) seizures.
C)
Q4: The exclusionary rule was applied to the
Q5: The major purpose of the exclusionary rule
Q6: The "fruits of the poisonous tree" doctrine
Q8: In the case of Katz v. United
Q9: The test for any expectation of privacy
Q10: The below-named judicial officer may issue a
Q11: Abandonment, plain view, and open fields are:
A)
Q12: What area(s) may a spouse give consent
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents