For many years, the interpretation of the right of the accused to be present during trial was so rigid that, if a defendant was not present, a trial had to be halted until he or she was in attendance.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Historically, the right of the accused to be present at their trial was interpreted very strictly, requiring the presence of the defendant for the trial to proceed. This principle is rooted in the fundamental rights to a fair trial and to confront one's accusers, as recognized in various legal systems around the world.

For Many Years, the Interpretation of the Right of the Accused