The editors of Harvard Law Review argue against compulsory voting laws on the grounds that such laws would dilute the median level of political knowledge and sophistication among voters.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of The editors of Harvard Law Review argue against compulsory voting laws on the grounds that such laws would dilute the median level of political knowledge and sophistication among voters.

The Editors of Harvard Law Review Argue Against Compulsory Voting