Dixon Argues That the Right to Self-Defense Does Not Imply

Dixon argues that the right to self-defense does not imply the right to own a gun. How does Huemer respond?

A) Huemer agrees that the right to self-defense does not imply the right to gun ownership. But he contends that talk of self-defense is irrelevant because the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution implies the right to bear arms.
B) Huemer argues that a ban on handguns would be a significant violation of the right of self-defense.
C) Huemer agrees that the right to self-defense does not imply the right to own a gun; however, Huemer argues that there are other, more weightly considerations in favor of gun ownership.
D) All of the above