What does McMahan say about the "ticking bomb" case?
A) Use of torture in this particular case could be justified because it is the lesser of the two evils.
B) Use of torture in this particular case could be justified as an instance of the principle of preventative justice.
C) Use of torture in this particular case is not justified because we cannot know with certainty that the person we are torturing is responsible for the bomb or even has any information about the bomb.
D) Use of torture in this particular case is not justified because torture is categorically wrong.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Jus ad bellum deals with the morality
Q17: According to Just War Theory, war is
Q18: Jus in bello deals with the rules
Q19: Which of the following is a long
Q20: What do Margalit and Walzer say Israel
Q22: The pacifist believes that no war had
Q23: Consider each of the following arguments: the
Q24: Lackey considers the following question: If it
Q25: Consider the following criticism anti-war pacifism: The
Q26: Shaw lists six criteria of jus ad
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents