Parijs objects to the welfare state on the grounds that it is wrong to force taxpayers to subsidize surfers-people who can work but refuse to work. How does Isbister respond to this objection?
A) He argues that taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize those who choose not to work-government programs should exist to help only those who truly cannot work.
B) He argues that taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize those who choose not to work-if they get hungry enough, they will either die or get a job.
C) He argues that taxpayers should be forced to subsidize those who choose not to work because their choice is not a free choice, but is the end result of lowered self-worth, a byproduct of discrimination against the poor and downtrodden.
D) He argue that taxpayers should be forced to subsidize those who choose not to work because those who appear to not want to work are often psychologically incapable of sustained work.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Haslett argues that inheritance is inconsistent with
Q9: The core issue in Kelo v. City
Q10: In his dissenting opinion, Justice O'Connor argues
Q11: The editors of Harvard Law Review argue
Q12: What does Isbister identify as the greatest
Q14: How does Isbister propose to eliminate poverty?
A)
Q15: Veach argues for which of the following
Q16: Haslett argues that _ should be abolished.
A)
Q17: Haslett argues that inheritance is inconsistent with
Q18: Which of the following does Haslett identify
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents