In a recent 2009 ruling,the Supreme Court of Canada found it necessary to direct that judges in lower courts were prohibited from redrafting overly broad non-competition clauses to make them legal and enforceable,stating that such clauses are simply and utterly unenforceable.Why did the Supreme Court find it necessary to invoke this prohibition?
A) to restate policy that vague or ambiguous clauses are unenforceable
B) because such clauses improperly bind employees unable to afford litigation costs
C) because such clauses are difficult to prove when the meaning is in fact unclear
D) to restate a central policy objective to facilitate drafting of broad clauses
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: What is the legal definition of a
Q27: What is the legal definition of "mistake"?
A)
Q33: Under what circumstances might a court enforce
Q34: What criteria must be satisfied in order
Q34: Which of the following is a distinguishing
Q37: Which of the following reflects the general
Q38: Why do the courts subject restrictive covenants
Q40: What was the intended purpose of the
Q41: A voidable contract is one that an
Q47: Only misrepresentations that were significant to the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents