In what case was the Supreme Court of Canada presented with an argument by insured's counsel based on s. 171(b) of the Insurance Act providing in part that "Where a contract ... contains any stipulation, condition or warranty that is or may be material to the risk ... the exclusion, stipulation, condition or warranty shall not be binding on the insured if it is held to be unjust or unreasonable?"
A) Royal Bank of Canada v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [2005] 1 S.C.R. 799
B) Triple Five Corp. v. Simcoe & Erie Group (1994) , AFF'D [1997] 5 W.W.R. 1 (C.A.)
C) Lucena v. Caufurd (1806) , 2 B. & P. (N.R.) 269 at 301
D) Marche v. Halifax Insurance Co. [2005] 1 S.C.R. 47
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Which of the following is provided for
Q6: Which of the following has the main
Q8: Which of the following can be attributed
Q9: An insured has noted on its insurance
Q10: Allowing people to insure property that they
Q11: What type of insurance would provide payment
Q11: Which of the following must be present
Q12: When an insurer compensates an insured,it has
Q13: Which of the following is a key
Q16: Which of the following is a distinguishing
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents