Random assignment with a very large sample of clients to two different groups of practitioners, one of which provides an innovative intervention and the other of which provides treatment as usual, is sufficient for ruling out which of the following explanations for results showing that the experimental group's outcome was significantly better than the control group's outcome?
A) Lack of practitioner equivalence.
B) Differential attrition rates.
C) Obtrusive observation.
D) All of the above.
E) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Which of the following statements is correct
Q5: Which statement is the most appropriate interpretation
Q6: If both groups both improve significantly in
Q7: What should we conclude regarding the effectiveness
Q8: What should we conclude regarding the effectiveness
Q10: Random assignment always removes the need for
Q11: The posttest-only control group design is always
Q12: Random assignment to two alternative treatments removes
Q13: The classic pretest-posttest control group design controls
Q14: Extremely obtrusive observation can be a fatal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents