Why did the Court rule that being sniffed by a trained drug dog did NOT constitute an unreasonable search?
A) The dog's sniff is intrusive but is necessary to find contraband.
B) The dog's sniff is not intrusive and only reveals the presence of contraband.
C) The dog's sniff is not admissible in a court of law as evidence.
D) The dog's sniff may lead to police to discover other crimes beyond drug possession.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: What can police do to a person
Q21: Which standard of proof would lead a
Q22: How is reasonable force defined?
A) any amount
Q23: According to the Fourth Amendment, police must
Q24: The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently ruled
Q26: If a police officer's life or another's
Q27: An order from a court, issued by
Q28: Most searches are made in emergency situations,
Q29: Malcolm, a 28-year-old African American man, is
Q30: Many people wrongly assume that exceptions to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents