
Suppose in Finland a worker can produce either 32 cell phones or 4 kayaks, while in Canada a worker can produce either 40 cell phones or 10 kayaks.
a.Which country has an absolute advantage in cell phone production? In kayak production?
b.What is the opportunity cost of 1 cell phone in Finland? In Canada?
c.What is the opportunity cost of 1 kayak in Finland? In Canada?
d.Which country has a comparative advantage in cell phone production? In kayak production?
e.Suppose each country has 1,000 workers.Currently, each country devotes 40 percent of its labour force to cell phone production and 60 percent to kayak production.What is the output of cell phones and kayaks for each country and what is the total output of cell phones and kayaks between the two countries?
f.Suppose each country specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage.What is the total output of cell phones and kayaks in the two countries?
g.Provide a numerical example to show how Finland and Canada can both gain from trade.Assume that the terms of trade are established at 6 cell phones for 1 kayak.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q21: An economic principle that explains why countries
Q38: Table 7.1 Q39: Table 7.1 Q40: Table 7.2 Q42: Canada is a leading exporter of wheat.What Q44: In the 1970s and 1980s, North America Q50: If Estonia has an absolute advantage in Q96: A consequence of increasing marginal costs of Q100: Tastes for products such as beer differ.As Q117: What is autarky?
Output Per Hour of Work
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents