The Ecke's family virtual monopoly on commercial poinsettia production by grafting together two varieties of the plant ended around 1996 when university researchers were able to independently make the same discovery.The Ecke family did not patent their grafting process.Would the Ecke's have been better off if they had patented their process of growing poinsettias?
A) Yes, it would have allowed them to earn economic profits indefinitely.
B) That depends on how long they had a monopoly before university researchers made the discovery. If the discovery was made after the period of time when patents expire, then the Ecke family is not any better off.
C) No, even with a patent protection, the Ecke family cannot prevent government-funded academic institutions from researching into plant breeding.
D) No, seeking patent protection necessitates divulging enough information that would enable others to information to discover ways of grafting poinsettias that were similar to the Ecke method but that did not violate the patent.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: One reason patent protection is vitally important
Q24: For which of the following firms is
Q31: Governments grant patents to
A)compensate firms for research
Q35: Governments grant patents to encourage
A)research and development
Q35: An example of a monopoly based on
Q40: A public franchise
A)is a corporation that is
Q41: The United States Post Office
A) faces no
Q53: Research has shown that most economic profits
Q54: In a natural monopoly, throughout the range
Q57: What is the difference between a public
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents