Table 152 -Refer to Table 15

Table 15.2
$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline & \begin{array}{c}\text { Highway } \\\text { Improvements }\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Employment } \\\text { Insurance Benefits }\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Social } \\\text { Safetynet } \\\text { Reform }\end{array} \\\hline \text { Bart } & \text { 1st } & \text { 3rd } & \text { 2nd } \\\hline \text { Lisa } & \text { 2nd } & \text { lst } & \text { 3rd } \\\hline \text { Maggie } & \text { 3rd } & \text { 2nd } & \text { 1st } \\\hline\end{array}$
-Refer to Table 15.2.The table above outlines the rankings of three members of Parliament on three spending alternatives.Assume that Parliament can spend additional revenue on only one of the three spending alternatives and that Bart, Lisa, and Maggie, all members of Parliament, participate in a series of votes in which they are to determine which of the spending alternatives should receive funding.Three votes will be taken: (1)Highway Improvements and Employment Insurance Benefits (2)Highway Improvements and Social Safetynet Reform and (3)Employment Insurance Benefits and Social Safetynet Reform.
Show the results of each vote and determine whether the voting paradox will occur as a result of these votes.