
In the case of Herff Jones Canada Inc. v. Todd, the Court considered a clause in a sales representative's contract that prohibited the representative from working for a competitor for four years. What did the Court hold?
A) The covenant was enforced, despite been overly excessive, on the basis of the principle of the freedom to contract.
B) The covenant was enforced because it was reasonable between the parties and reasonable with regard to the public interest.
C) The covenant was void because such provisions are in restraint of trade and therefore automatically illegal.
D) The covenant was unenforceable because it was not under seal.
E) The covenant was unenforceable because such covenants demand independent legal advice prior to execution and none was obtained.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following statements is correct
Q24: Which one of the following statements is
Q25: Jeff had worked for Sweetums Candy Shoppe
Q28: In Robichaud v. Canada (Treasury Board), the
Q32: In Dowling v. Ontario (Workplace Safety and
Q35: Which of the following is an unfair
Q37: Federal and provincial human rights legislation cover
Q38: If the place of employment is not
Q39: When _ are included in the original
Q40: (Modify this question for your province.) To
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents