
Hank sold three properties for Mr. W and was paid his commission for the first property, but not for the last two. Hank has done everything according to the contract and according to the relevant statutes, but Mr. W will not pay. Hank knows that Mr. W has a bank account with the Bank of Toronto and has money owed to him from a Mr. Gregory. If Hank successfully sues Mr. W., which of the following would be False?
A) The lawsuit commenced by Hank against Mr. W would be for breach of contract.
B) Hank could force the bank to pay into court an amount of money from Mr. W's account to satisfy the debt.
C) Hank could personally seize the property of Mr. Gregory to satisfy the debt.
D) Hank could have a government-authorized official seize enough of Mr. W's goods to satisfy the judgment debt.
E) Hank could examine Mr. W under oath to determine what assets he has.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Which of the following is true with
Q45: (Modify this question for your province.) Which
Q47: A privative clause is which of the
Q48: Which one of the following statements is
Q49: A requirement of the rules of _
Q49: Mr. Holden, a program developer, developed software
Q53: Which of the following statements concerning limitation
Q54: In Baker v. Canada, the Supreme Court
Q57: Which of the following is not a
Q59: The procedure that allows a judgment creditor
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents