In the Case of Procor Ltd

In the case of Procor Ltd. v. U.S.W.A., what did the Court find?

A) The fact that the officials were wilfully blind to the truth was enough to establish malice.
B) A finding of malice could not be supported because it always requires an outright lie.
C) A proven False statement is sufficient to support a claim of injurious Falsehood, as long as some damage has resulted.
D) While making unfounded accusations is poor business practice, only nominal damages can be awarded for such conduct.
E) While making unfounded accusations is unethical, it does not constitute tortious conduct.