In the case of Matsushita v.Zenith,the fact that the foreign television manufacturers were able to charge lower prices than their domestic competitors in the U.S.market for televisions was sufficient evidence to conclude that the Japanese firms were engaged in predatory pricing.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is not entirely accurate. In Matsushita v. Zenith, the court did not solely rely on the fact that Japanese firms charged lower prices to conclude that they were engaged in predatory pricing. The court considered a variety of factors, including the size of the firm's market share, its production costs, its profit margins, and its pricing behavior, among other things.

In the Case of Matsushita V