Economists argue that the level of pollution should be
A)reduced completely to zero because by definition, it has a negative external effect.
B)ignored because it has always been present since the beginning of history.
C)reduced to the point where the marginal benefit of pollution reduction is equal to the marginal cost of pollution reduction to society.
D)best determined by elected officials who can speak on behalf of the public.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Economists argue that the level of pollution should be reduced to the point where the marginal benefit equals the marginal cost. This means that society should continue to reduce pollution until the cost of reducing pollution is equal to the benefits gained from the reduction. This approach allows society to improve the environment without sacrificing economic growth. A complete reduction to zero is not feasible, and ignoring pollution is not an ideal option as it can have severe negative impacts on health and the environment. Elected officials can represent the public, but they should base their decisions on sound economic principles rather than political interests.

Economists Argue That the Level of Pollution Should Be