
In Dementas v.Estate of Tallas,the Utah Court of Appeals ruled that Tallas's promise was not enforceable as past consideration is not valid.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Agreeing not to open a competing business
Q3: "I'll sell you my car if I
Q5: Raul agrees to paint Mike's house for
Q5: Hilda owes Lex $3,000,which is an undisputed
Q14: Society enforces all promises in the interests
Q18: Consideration means that there is a bargaining
Q20: Reuben climbs up a tree in his
Q22: Lisa owes $800 to Bella Shoe Store.She
Q29: The Kelsoe v.International Wood Products,Inc.case was an
Q37: A promise by Derkin Restaurants to buy
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents