What do advocates of drug interdiction argue
A)Its benefits may be more short run rather than long run.
B)Higher drug prices caused by such policies might discourage drug experimentation by young people.
C)It is too costly for the government to implement such a program.
D)The program is out-dated and should be replaced with a drug education program.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Advocates of drug interdiction argue that higher drug prices caused by interdiction might discourage drug experimentation by young people. They also argue that drug interdiction may have short-run benefits in reducing drug availability and use, although its long-run benefits may be less certain. The cost-effectiveness of drug interdiction is often questioned, but it is not argued that it is too costly to implement. Lastly, advocates of drug interdiction do not argue for the replacement of drug interdiction with a drug education program.

What Do Advocates of Drug Interdiction Argue