Brennan owns a dog whose barking annoys Brennan's neighbour Emily.Brennan receives personal benefit from owning the dog,and Emily bears a cost of Brennan's ownership of the dog.Assuming Emily has the legal right to peace and quiet,which action is necessary
A)If Brennan's benefit exceeds Emily's cost, government intervention is necessary.
B)Brennan will pay to keep his dog if his benefit exceeds Emily's cost.
C)If Emily's cost exceeds Brennan's benefit, Brennan will pay Emily to keep his dog.
D)If Emily has the legal right to peace and quiet, she only has to pay Brennan when her cost is below his benefit.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Option B is the best choice. If Brennan's benefit of owning a dog outweighs the cost borne by Emily, then Brennan should be willing to pay for measures that reduce noise pollution. For instance, he may consider paying for soundproofing the room where the dog stays or may train his dog to bark less. This way, Brennan can continue to own his dog while reducing the negative impact on Emily's comfort. If Emily's cost exceeds Brennan's benefit, then Brennan may be willing to pay Emily to keep his dog. But with the given information, it is best to start with option B as it is the most straightforward way of addressing the problem.

Brennan Owns a Dog Whose Barking Annoys Brennan's Neighbour Emily