
The Credit River has two polluting firms on its banks. Plants A and B each dump 100 tonnes of effluent into the river each year. The cost per tonne of reducing emissions is $20 for plant A and $100 for Plant B. The government wants to reduce overall pollution from 200 tonnes to 50 tonnes.
a.If the government knew the cost of reduction for each firm, what reductions would it impose in order to achieve its overall goal at the least possible total cost? What would be the cost to each firm, and the total cost?
b.If, in the absence of information about each firm’s costs, the government decided to reach its overall goal by imposing uniform reductions on the firms, what would be the cost to each firm, and the total cost?
c.Compare the total costs in parts a and b. If the government does not know the cost of pollution reduction for each firm, is there still some way to reduce pollution to 50 tonnes at the total cost calculated in part a?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q55: Government can be used to solve externality
Q114: Using a supply and demand diagram, demonstrate
Q201: The Coase theorem suggests that efficient solutions
Q202: Using a demand and supply framework,explain why
Q203: To produce honey, beekeepers place hives of
Q206: Why are public policy solutions such as
Q207: Collectively, the 10,000 residents of Credit Valley
Q208: Graphically illustrate the quantity of pollution that
Q209: Brennan and Emily are neighbours; Brennan owns
Q210: Imagine you are a nonsmoker sharing a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents