According to the text, unanimous agreement is NOT the best way to determine the merits of a proposed alternative strategy.To avoid this consensus trap, which technique involves presenting two conflicting views (the thesis and the antithesis)presented in a debate format?
A)devil's advocate
B)Sloan's judgment
C)sales presentation
D)dialectical inquiry
E)scenario construction

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Dialectical inquiry involves presenting two conflicting views, the thesis and the antithesis, in a debate format to avoid the consensus trap of unanimous agreement. It encourages individuals to critically examine both sides and come up with a synthesis that combines the best of both approaches. Devil's advocate challenges the assumptions and ideas presented in a decision-making process, Sloan's judgment involves consulting experts and gathering data to make a decision, sales presentation focuses on persuading others to adopt a particular strategy, and scenario construction involves creating plausible future scenarios to evaluate potential strategies. While these techniques may be useful in decision-making, they do not specifically address the issue of avoiding the consensus trap.

According to the Text, Unanimous Agreement Is NOT the Best