General Theory
-a. If we interpret the sentence "All scientists are philosophers" so that it is correctly symbolized by , then why will "All scientists are philosophers" not imply "Some scientists are philosophers"?
b. If we interpret “All scientists are philosophers” so that it has existential import, then does “All scientists are philosophers” imply “Some scientists are philosophers” or not? (Defend your answer.)
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: General Theory
-Assuming existential import, explain what the
Q2: General Theory
-Prove that no valid syllogism in
Q4: General Theory
-Assume for the moment (whether it
Q5: True-False
-The predicate term of "Some scientists are
Q6: True-False
-The subject term of "All scientists are
Q7: True-False
-The subject term of "Some scientists are
Q8: True-False
-"All scientists are philosophers" and "No scientists
Q9: True-False
-"Some scientists are not philosophers" and "All
Q10: True-False
-"Some scientists are not philosophers" and "Some
Q11: True-False
-We can validly infer from "All scientists
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents