In a recent case, Revlon sued United Overseas Limited (UOL)in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for breach of contract. UOL countered by asking the court to dismiss the claim since they are not operating in that area. Revlon cited the presence of a UOL sign above the entrance to the offices of a New York company in which UOL had a 50-percent ownership. The court dismissed UOL's claim. This is an issue related to :

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This issue is related to jurisdiction, which refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide a case. In this case, Revlon argued that the court had jurisdiction because UOL had a presence in New York, while UOL argued that they did not operate in the area, and therefore the court did not have jurisdiction. The court ultimately dismissed UOL's claim, affirming that it did have jurisdiction over the case.

In a Recent Case, Revlon Sued United Overseas Limited (UOL)in