Which of the following arguments was key to the NAACP's case in Sweatt v.Painter?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark case that ruled that separate professional schools for Blacks and Whites were inherently unequal in educational quality. The NAACP argued that educational quality extends beyond physical facilities and includes access to experienced faculty, adequate resources, and a supportive learning environment. The court agreed and held that Texas' separate law school for Blacks failed to provide an equal educational opportunity, and ordered the school to integrate. Therefore, the argument that one must look beyond physical facilities when evaluating educational quality was key to the NAACP's case in Sweatt v. Painter.

Which of the Following Arguments Was Key to the NAACP's