Evaluating location alternatives by comparing their composite (weighted-average) scores involves
A) factor-rating analysis
B) cost-volume analysis
C) transportation model analysis
D) linear regression analysis
E) crossover analysis

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Evaluating location alternatives by comparing their composite (weighted-average) scores involves factor-rating analysis, which assigns weights to different factors and then rates each location on those factors. This method allows for a comprehensive assessment of each location and helps to identify the best option based on the criteria established by the organization. Cost-volume analysis and transportation model analysis are not relevant for evaluating location alternatives, while linear regression analysis and crossover analysis are not specifically designed for this purpose.

Evaluating Location Alternatives by Comparing Their Composite (Weighted-Average) Scores Involves