On May 1, Emile bought a widget from Megan.The price was $15 000.On June 1, Emile paid that price by giving Megan a bill of exchange that was drawn on the Bank of Swift Current.The bill was stated to be payable "on demand." Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) Because the bill is payable on sight, Megan cannot present it to the Bank of Swift Current for acceptance
B) If Megan presents the bill to the Bank of Swift Current on July 1, she is entitled to receive $15 000 immediately.
C) The bill is invalid because while a promissory note can be payable on sight, a bill cannot.
D) Unlike certification of a cheque, acceptance of a bill would not create rights that Megan could use against the Bank of Swift Current.
E) The reason that the bill is considered to be payable "on sight" is that it was created some time after Emile and Megan created their sales contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Grant wanted to sue a car dealership
Q17: A share certificate may be a type
Q18: A document may be a negotiable instrument
Q19: Alexandra bought a snow blower from Rajeev.The
Q20: Stefan gave a cheque for $500 to
Q22: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q23: Fenna created a promissory note for $10
Q24: Wallace bought a widget from Sabrina.The price
Q25: Assume that today is March 1.On February
Q26: Ismail used a cheque to pay for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents