Civitas Inc sells widgets.The company recently complained in court that it was being prevented from using a particular type of advertisement.In some circumstances, such a restriction violates section 2(b) of the Charter.Ultimately, however, the court upheld the restriction and prevented Civitas Inc from advertising as it wished.Which of the following statements may explain that end result?
A) The restriction was imposed by a statute and the government responsible for that statute reacted to the court's decision by invoking the residual clause.
B) The party was not entitled to freedom of expression because it is a company rather than a human being.
C) The court held that the restriction was an "unreasonable limitation" on the freedom of expression.
D) The restriction was saved under section 15(2) of the Charter.
E) The restriction was imposed by a contract that Civitas Inc created with another private corporation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Lamda Corp is based in Vancouver but
Q42: Omega Inc manufactures several types of widgets
Q43: A triple ionized defraculator (or "TID," as
Q44: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)The
Q45: Lake Charybdis has long been a popular
Q47: The Town of Blackville created a set
Q48: Subordinate legislation
A)involves a statute that was introduced
Q49: A provincial statute says that a monthly
Q50: The notwithstanding clause
A)is contained in section 1
Q51: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents