A court recently held Acme Corp responsible for spilling pollutants into a stream.Which of the following statements is most likely TRUE?
A) If the court required proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the claim against Acme Corp arose in private law.
B) If the court required proof beyond a reasonable doubt, Acme Corp was called the accused and was prosecuted by the state in criminal or criminal like proceedings.
C) Since Acme Corp is not a human being, the case was heard in a special court called the Commercial Court of Canada.
D) If Acme Corp is dissatisfied with that decision, it is entitled to appeal, but only if it is willing to pay for the other side to bring its witnesses back into court.
E) If the claim against Acme Corp arose in private law, it almost certainly was heard by a jury, as well as a judge.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Wolodko Engineering Inc sued Dhaliwal Ltd for
Q12: Kathy has sued her employer in a
Q13: Makayla was recently served with a statement
Q14: Demartini Inc sued Bentley Regehr for breach
Q15: Scalia Inc sued Ginsberg Ltd.in tort.Scalia claimed
Q17: Kabesa Inc sued Mahuja Ltd.The court held
Q18: Although trade unions are unincorporated associations, and
Q19: A person generally is not entitled to
Q20: Hughes Inc hired Liz to act as
Q21: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents