Abdul worked for Primus Finance Co.Following a series of disastrous losses, several of the company's customers have sued Abdul in tort.Because Abdul has relatively little money, however, those customers also want to sue Primus Finance.Primus Finance denies vicarious liability by arguing that Abdul was an independent contractor rather than an employee.A court is more likely to decide that Abdul was an independent contractor if
A) Abdul decided for himself when, where, and how he would provide services to Primus Finance.
B) in order to perform his work, Abdul used an office and computer system that belonged to Primus Finance.
C) the customers who are suing protected themselves against losses through insurance policies.
D) Abdul committed his torts against the company's clients deliberately rather than carelessly.
E) Abdul was paid a consistent amount by Primus Finance every two weeks.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: Makayla successfully sued Deacon for the tort
Q41: Max worked in a warehouse owned by
Q42: Gold Star Investment Inc is in the
Q43: Teach Inc.sold a computer consulting business to
Q44: As a result of dumping toxic materials
Q46: Within the context of alternative compensation schemes,
Q47: Case Brief 3.2 discussed the Supreme Court
Q48: Paine Enterprises sued Montesquieu Corp.in tort.The court
Q49: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Q50: Which of the following torts fall within
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents