Rawls Inc.sued Nozick Ltd.in tort.The court awarded nominal damages.This means that
A) Nozick must have committed the tort of negligence.
B) the court held Nozick liable even though it did not know the company's name..
C) Nozick must have committed an equitable wrong rather than a legal wrong.
D) Rawls did not prove that it suffered an actual loss as a result of Nozick's tort.
E) Nozick must have committed the tort of defamation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Paine Enterprises sued Montesquieu Corp.in tort.The court
Q49: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Q50: Which of the following torts fall within
Q51: Eve is very angry about an incident
Q52: Bentham Inc sued Locke Ltd in tort.The
Q54: Faye is a wildlife expert who works
Q55: Case Brief 3.2 discusses the Supreme Court
Q56: Maria intends to create a new business,
Q57: Jojo suffered a catastrophic injury while she
Q58: Miriam worked as a financial advisor with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents