Johan owns an antique chair that has been in his family for generations.During a party at his house, Esther carved her initials into the underside of the chair's seat.She did so because she felt publicly humiliated after Johan had refused to dance with her.The chair has not been destroyed, but it will cost $10 000 to repair the damage.Johan would like to repair and retain the chair.Which of the following statements is TRUE?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Trespass to chattels is the appropriate tort in this case as Esther physically interfered with Johan's property, causing damage that can be repaired, and did not intend to take or permanently deprive him of the chair. Johan can seek damages for the cost of repair. Remedies such as an injunction or punitive damages may not be applicable in this situation. Detinue and conversion are not appropriate torts as the chair has not been taken or withheld from Johan's possession.

Johan Owns an Antique Chair That Has Been in His