Patricia and Charlie entered into a written agreement.Patricia promised to pay $5000 to Haden, who is Charlie's brother.Charlie placed his seal on the document, but Patricia did not do so.Three days later, Charlie promised that he would design a new computer program for Bethany, Patricia's sister, in exchange for Patricia's promise.Which of the following statements is the most accurate?
A) Patricia's promise is not enforceable because each party to a contract must provide a benefit to the other party of that contract.
B) Patricia's promise is enforceable because Charlie placed his seal on his agreement with her.
C) Charlie's promise is enforceable because it was given in exchange for Patricia's promise to pay $5000.
D) Patricia's promise is not enforceable because it was not given in exchange for consideration.
E) Patricia must pay $5000 to Haden if Charlie actually does design a new computer program for Bethany.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A gratuitous promise
A)occurs when one party promises
Q2: Hofflehass Architectural Ltd was hoping to persuade
Q4: Dina threatened to sue Chris for $25
Q5: Alpha Corp entered into an agreement with
Q6: Epsilon Inc and Delta Ltd entered into
Q7: Luke threatened to sue Leia for $50
Q8: Canadian courts consistently hold that a promise
Q9: A gratuitous promise is generally not enforceable.
Q10: The doctrine of promissory estoppel operates only
Q11: Tracey is a police officer.While she was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents