The decision in London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd is the leading authority for which of the following propositions?
A) A trust can be used to avoid the consequences of the privity of contract doctrine only if the parties actually intended to create a trust.
B) Forbearance to sue may be sufficient consideration even if the underlying claim was not actually valid.
C) In certain circumstances, an employee is entitled to enforce an exclusion clause that is contained in a contract that was created between an employer and a customer.
D) A promise to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation that is owed to one party may provide consideration under a new contract with a different party.
E) Sufficient consideration may consist of either a benefit provided to another person or a detriment to oneself.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: The word "estop" means
A)"to prove."
B)"to deny."
C)"to prevent."
D)"to
Q47: Carlos entered into a contract with Keisha.He
Q48: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)As
Q49: The employment exception to the privity doctrine
A)was
Q50: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)The
Q52: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)A
Q53: In which of the following situations is
Q54: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)Under
Q55: Sid and Nancy entered into a contract.Sid
Q56: Indira owed $5000 to Patrice.On a different
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents