Hamish entered into a contract with Shania.Under the terms of that agreement, she was required to deliver a widget to his factory within one week.As payment for that widget, Hamish immediately gave Shania a cheque for $5000 and a used widget that he no longer required.Shania intended to re-calibrate that widget and sell it to another customer for $1000.A dispute has arisen between the parties.Hamish argues that the agreement is governed by the Sale of Goods Act.Shania disagrees and in support of her position, she points to a section in the statute that says that the buyer must provide "a money consideration, called the price." And, as she reminds Hamish, he did not give any cash to her.Is the parties' contract governed by the Sale of Goods Act? Explain your answer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q65: Hiram is about to agree to sell
Q66: On May 1, Suneel entered into a
Q67: Explain the basic differences between: (i) a
Q68: The Sale of Goods Act applies only
Q69: Zounds Sounds, a music store, ordered 20
Q70: Crystal purchased a specific, fully functioning widget
Q71: Sareena has owned and operated her own
Q72: Discuss the significance of a buyer's reasonable
Q73: "The Sale of Goods Act was intended
Q75: The Sale of Goods Act applies only
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents