Salome owned a piece of land called Blackacre.She committed the tort of nuisance against Prem by allowing noxious fumes to waft from Blackacre and onto his property.The court held her liable for $100 000 in compensatory damages.Recently, Salome sold Blackacre to Shandon for $250 000.Which of the following statements is most likely TRUE?
A) Shandon's purchase of Blackacre cannot possibly be valid unless Salome has paid $100 000 to Prem.
B) If Salome has not yet paid $100 000 to Prem, and if Prem filed a writ of execution with the sheriff's office before the date of the purported sale, then Shandon's purchase of Blackacre cannot possibly be valid.
C) Prem can use a vendor's lien to force the sale of Blackacre if he does not receive $100 000 from Salome within 24 months from the date of judgment in the nuisance action.
D) Prem can use a vendor's lien to force the sale of Blackacre if he does not receive $100 000 from Salome within 12 months from the date of judgment in the nuisance action.
E) Shandon did nothing wrong and Prem does not have a registered interest on title.Nevertheless, if Blackacre is located in a jurisdiction that recognizes writs of execution as interests in land, then Shandon may lose Blackacre if he refuses to pay $100 000 to Prem.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Herschel borrowed $500 000 from Minah.As security
Q22: Hristo created a mortgage, in favour of
Q23: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)The
Q24: Albert owns a piece of land called
Q25: Astrid borrowed $500 000 from Bartholomew.As security
Q27: Letitia contractually agreed to sell a piece
Q28: Which of the following statements provides the
Q29: Which of the following interests in land
Q30: Randall initially owned a piece of land
Q31: Pavla is the victim of mortgage fraud
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents