Rose and Caradoc were romantically involved for several years.During that time, she gave a necklace to him.The couple then had a terrible fight and broke up.Because he no longer wanted anything to do with Rose, Caradoc threw the necklace into a garbage can that was located in the main hall of a railway station.That station is owned by the Regional Transport Authority (RTA), but members of the public are always welcome.Francis saw the necklace in the garbage and took it home with him.All four parties (Francis, Rose, Caradoc, and the RTA) now claim the right to possession of the necklace.Which of the following statements is most likely TRUE?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In this scenario, Francis holds the strongest claim to possession of the necklace because he exercised control over it by taking it home with him. The fact that the necklace was thrown in the garbage can on RTA's property does not automatically mean that they have the right to claim possession, as discarded items are generally considered abandoned property. Rose does not have an automatic entitlement to the necklace just because she gave it to Caradoc, and Caradoc forfeited his right to claim possession when he threw it away. There is no evidence to suggest co-ownership between any parties.

Rose and Caradoc Were Romantically Involved for Several Years