Zelig owns a widget worth $25 000.He purchased property insurance from Superior Insurance Co.The widget was irreparably damaged as a result of an accident that was caused by Zoe.Zoe has a liability insurance policy from Erie Insurance Co.Which of the following statements is most likely to be TRUE?
A) Zelig cannot claim a benefit from Superior Insurance Co unless Zoe caused the accident in a way that exposed her to liability in tort.
B) If it is required to pay a benefit of $25 000 to Zelig, Superior Insurance Co can claim the same amount of money from Erie Insurance Co even if Zoe could not be held liable to Zelig for damaging the widget.
C) If Superior Insurance Co sues Zoe, it will do so on the basis of the concept of contribution.
D) The concept of subrogation means that if Zelig successfully sues Zoe in tort, she will be able to claim a benefit from Superior Insurance Co.
E) If Superior Insurance Co pays a benefit to Zelig, it will be entitled to exercise subrogated rights against Zoe.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Because he was new to the city,
Q46: Acme Moving Inc contractually agreed to move
Q47: Which of the following statements is most
Q48: Before she left for a one-month trip
Q49: Which of the following statements is most
Q51: Theta Ltd owned a widget worth $50
Q52: Alan purchased a piece of land from
Q53: The phrase "nemo dat quod non habet
Q54: Naomi owned an inventory of widgets worth
Q55: Aziz abandoned a bicycle by the side
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents