Mathilde entered into an agreement with Pascal saying that she was acting on behalf of Citron Used Cars to purchase cars.In fact, Mathilde had no actual or apparent authority to do so.Moreover, Citron now refuses to ratify the agreement.In this situation, Pascal can hold

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Mathilde misrepresented her authority to enter into the contract, making her in breach of the implied warranty of authority. Therefore, Pascal can hold Mathilde liable for the breach of this warranty. As Citron did not ratify the agreement, they cannot be held liable under the contract, nor can they be held liable for breach of fiduciary duty, as Mathilde did not have a fiduciary duty to Pascal on behalf of Citron.

Mathilde Entered into an Agreement with Pascal Saying That She