Mischa had a consulting business that he carried on as a sole proprietorship.He was negotiating a contract to provide advice to Vengo Inc, a corporation carrying on business as a venture capitalist.Mischa has been dealing with Prashant, an old friend.Prashant is the office manager and Mischa knows that Prashant does not have authority to contract with him.But Vengo is aware that Prashant has been talking with Mischa, so Mischa thinks that if he gets Prashant to sign a contract, it will be binding on Vengo.Is he right?
A) Yes.By acquiescing in Prashant negotiating with Mischa, Vengo has represented that Prashant has authority to bind Vengo.
B) No.The fact that Prashant does not have actual authority means that a contract signed by him on behalf of Vengo will not be binding.
C) No.The fact that Mischa knows that Prashant does not have authority means that he cannot rely on Prashant having apparent authority.
D) Yes.It is within the usual authority of a office manager to hire consultants.
E) No.It is not within the usual authority of a office manager to hire consultants.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Actual authority of an employee may NOT
Q27: Which of the following statements best describes
Q28: Yasir is a director and the operations
Q29: Elroy was the controlling shareholder and sole
Q30: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Q32: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Q33: Which if the following statements is FALSE?
A)A
Q34: Ola holds 75 percent of the shares
Q35: George wants to get out of his
Q36: Which of the following statements best describes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents