The Decision in Forster & Sons Ltd V Suggett (1918)35

The decision in Forster & Sons Ltd v Suggett (1918) 35 TLR 87 was based on the fact that:

A) the restraint of trade clause was an unreasonable exercise of the employer's superior bargaining power.
B) the restraint of trade clause was a reasonable protection of the employer's proprietary interest.
C) the restraint of trade clause was imposed merely to restrict competition.
D) arms length bargaining with legal advice on both sides meant there was no inequality of bargaining power.