The decision of the court in Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1943] AC 32 was:
A) That the manufacturer of the machine which was being built to meet the order of the purchaser could not recover the cost of manufacturing the machine because the frustrating event had intervened to terminate the contract.
B) That the purchaser of the machine could recover the deposit which it had paid.
C) That the contract was terminated by frustration.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: An assignment of a debt at common
Q19: The absence of privity of contract will
Q20: A discharge by accord and satisfaction occurs
Q21: Why did the court find that the
Q22: Which of the following is the best
Q24: What factors must be present in order
Q25: Describe the quantum meruit rule and when
Q26: The benefit of frustration is available in
Q27: A claim for quantum meruit can be
Q28: In the case of discharge by performance,the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents